Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Clin Lab ; 68(10)2022 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2080862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Establishment of reference intervals (RIs) for different biomarkers is essential for clinical monitoring. The purpose of this study was to establish laboratory RIs of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG for elder population. MATERIALS: Performance verification was conducted with reference to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, including linearity, imprecision, and allowable dilution ratio. Based on CLSI C28-A3 document, a total of 3,734 serum samples were collected, and 3,733 serum samples were used for the establishment of RIs for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG. The subjects were grouped by gender and age. The age groups were as follows: 60 - 69 years, 70 - 79 years, 80 - 89 years, and 90 - 101 years. The RI was defined by nonparametric 95th percentile intervals. RESULTS: Percentage deviation of all the seven dilutions were all less than 12.5% during linearity evaluation. The inter-assay and intra-assay imprecision were all less than 5%. There is no significant difference between different gender and age groups for IgM (p = 0.0818, p = 0.7094), and there is significant difference between different gender and age groups for IgG (p = 0.0011, p = 0.0013). Harris-Boyd's test did not indicate partitioning for IgM and IgG. Cutoff values of RI for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG were defined as 0.1523 S/CO and 0.2663 S/CO, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RIs of SRAR-CoV-2 IgM and IgG were established for elder population, which can play an important role in the prevention and control of the epidemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Middle Aged
2.
J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng ; 133: 104273, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1683396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a substantial increase in mortality and economic and social disruption. The absence of US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) highlights the need for new therapeutic drugs to combat COVID-19. METHODS: The present study proposed a fuzzy hierarchical optimization framework for identifying potential antiviral targets for COVID-19. The objectives in the decision-making problem were not only to evaluate the elimination of the virus growth, but also to minimize side effects causing treatment. The identified candidate targets could promote processes of drug discovery and development. SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS: Our gene-centric method revealed that dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibition could reduce viral biomass growth and metabolic deviation by 99.4% and 65.6%, respectively, and increase cell viability by 70.4%. We also identified two-target combinations that could completely block viral biomass growth and more effectively prevent metabolic deviation. We also discovered that the inhibition of two antiviral metabolites, cytidine triphosphate (CTP) and uridine-5'-triphosphate (UTP), exhibits effects similar to those of molnupiravir, which is undergoing phase III clinical trials. Our predictions also indicate that CTP and UTP inhibition blocks viral RNA replication through a similar mechanism to that of molnupiravir.

3.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 14: 1869-1879, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1232504

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During a public health emergency, social media is a major conduit or vector for spreading health misinformation. Understanding the characteristics of health misinformation can be a premise for rebuking and purposefully correcting such misinformation on social media. METHODS: Using samples of China's misinformation on social media related to the COVID-19 outbreak (N=547), the objective of this article was to illustrate the characteristics of said misinformation on social media in China by descriptive analysis, including the typology, the most-mentioned information, and a developmental timeline. RESULTS: The results reveal that misinformation related to preventive and therapeutic methods is the most-mentioned type. Other types of misinformation associated with people's daily lives are also widespread. Moreover, cultural and social beliefs have an impact on the perception and propaganda of misinformation, and changes in the crisis situation are relevant to the type variance of misinformation. CONCLUSION: Following research results, strategies of health communication for managing misinformation on social media are given, such as credible sources and expert sources. Also, traditional beliefs or perceptions play the vital role in health communication. To sum up, combating misinformation on social media is likely not a single effort to correct misinformation or to prevent its spread. Instead, scholars, journalists, educators, and citizens must collaboratively identify and correct any misinformation.

4.
The American Review of Public Administration ; 50(6-7):720-724, 2020.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1067065

ABSTRACT

This article aims to argue that evidence-based decision-making for a public health emergency is "easier said than done" reflected on COVID-19 response in China. For the local government, the behavioral pattern is prone to blame-avoiding instead of making decision following scientific evidence and experts' advice. However, such behavior is not based on completely subjective judgment but a rational choice for the local government. Some consequences associated with China's response to COVID-19 reveals an inflexible administrative system. Therefore, China's governance reform should focus on empowering local governments with more flexibility and resilience, which enables local governments to make independent and scientific decisions in an emergency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

5.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 13: 3259-3270, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1033257

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Communities are central to the practice of public health emergency preparedness and response. This article mainly focuses on COVID-19 and discusses the formation and structure of community disaster resilience, which is an effective method for coping with such a public health emergency. METHODS: Based on the management of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, this article uses Shanghai's experience to illustrate how a community disaster resilience was formed for risk management. Resorting to the analytical framework of risk city, principles of community disaster resilience are given. RESULTS: Four actions can be recommended based on Shanghai's experience: 1) Applying a vulnerability analysis matrix for targeted risk governance, 2) empowering volunteer groups for emergency response, 3) policy and action for public health emergency prevention, and 4) risk communication for uncertainty-oriented planning. CONCLUSION: Shanghai's experience offers a reference to tackle the COVID-19 at the global level. The COVID-19 outbreak highlights that humans still face various unpredictable health risks in the future. Forming a connection-based resilience at the community level is an effective way to risk management.

6.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 17(19)2020 10 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1000275

ABSTRACT

Health rumors often mislead people and cause adverse health behaviors. Especially during a public health emergency, health rumors may result in severe consequences for people's health and risk governance. Insight into how these rumors form and harm people's health behavior is critical for assisting people in establishing scientific health cognition and to enhance public health emergency responses. Using the case study with interview data of a salient purchase craze led by a health rumor during the COVID-19 outbreak in China, this article aimed to illustrate the process of how a piece of information becomes a health rumor. Furthermore, we identify factors that cause people to believe rumors and conduct behavior that leads to a purchase craze. Results show that a public misunderstanding of the unique psychology of uncertainty, cultural and social cognition, and conformity behavior jointly informs people's beliefs in rumors and further causes purchase craze behavior. We developed a simplified model to demonstrate how an ordinary news report can lead to a rumor. Based on this model, some implications of effective health communication are suggested for managing rumors.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Deception , Disease Outbreaks , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pandemics , Public Health
7.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 8(1)2020 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-833423

ABSTRACT

Risk communication is critical to emergency management. The objective of this paper is to illustrate the effective process and attention points of risk communication reflecting on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) outbreak in Wuhan, China. We provide the timeline of risk communication progress in Wuhan and use a message-centered approach to identify problems that it entailed. It was found that the delayed decision making of the local government officials and the limited information disclosure should be mainly responsible for the ineffective risk communication. The principles for effective risk communication concerning Wuhan's outbreak management were also discussed. The whole communication process is suggested to integrate the accessibility and openness of risk information, the timing and frequency of communication, and the strategies dealing with uncertainties. Based on these principles and lessons from Wuhan's case, this paper employed a simplified Government-Expert-Public risk communication model to illustrate a collaborative network for effective risk communication.

8.
The American Review of Public Administration ; : 0275074020942410-0275074020942410, 2020.
Article | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-672017

ABSTRACT

This article aims to argue that evidence-based decision-making for a public health emergency is ?easier said than done? reflected on COVID-19 response in China. For the local government, the behavioral pattern is prone to blame-avoiding instead of making decision following scientific evidence and experts? advice. However, such behavior is not based on completely subjective judgment but a rational choice for the local government. Some consequences associated with China?s response to COVID-19 reveals an inflexible administrative system. Therefore, China?s governance reform should focus on empowering local governments with more flexibility and resilience, which enables local governments to make independent and scientific decisions in an emergency.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL